Reconstruct the previous site
URLs, content, internal linking and organic landing pages provide the comparison baseline.
SEO after launch
The useful question is not whether the new site looks better or worse. It is which signals changed at launch and which pages or queries lost visibility.
URLs, content, internal linking and organic landing pages provide the comparison baseline.
Redirects, canonicals, noindex, templates, rendering and content are compared with the old site.
Work on the signals that explain the drop instead of changing everything at once.
A redesign can change much more than layout. These are the first areas we compare.
Old pages can end up in 404s, redirect chains or weak destinations.
New templates can introduce signals that were never intended.
Useful copy, headings or sections that captured search demand may have been reduced or removed.
Menus and structure can redistribute importance toward different pages.
The comparison is done by page, query and directory, not only on total traffic.
Compare pages, queries, directories, dates and devices to see where the decline is concentrated.
Compare old and new URLs, redirects, canonicals, robots, linking and rendering.
Check titles, headings, useful copy and sections that may have been removed or moved.
Restore lost signals or technical relationships without unnecessarily undoing the redesign.
Track pages and queries after changes to separate recovery from remaining issues.
Before and after need to be read together. Aggregate traffic usually hides where the real issue sits.
We can compare before and after to identify which changes actually deserve intervention.